Here comes Tammany Hall on your High Street

My dictionary’s had an update. It now says that ‘localism’ is defined as ‘giving people things they do not want; forcing them into changes they do not need’. Yes, ‘executive mayors’ are back, even though just about no one outside of the DCLG has shown any desire for them.

As I wrote back in 2009, this is a spectacularly bad idea. One of the strengths – yes, there are some – of the British system is that there’s a separation between the political and administrative sides of government, both nationally and locally. This smashes down that wall and opens the system to all sorts of formalised corruption when the executive mayor has the power to hire and fire council officers.

True localism would be about allowing councils to determine their own methods of running themselves, not just getting to choose from a restricted list of increasingly dictatorial options offered by the DCLG. A DCLG that actually cared about giving real powers to Councils – as opposed to concentrating what little power they have into individuals – would be working to devolve more powers to them. Instead we get more hare-brained schemes, scribbled on the back of an envelope in opposition and now being imposed despite no one – outside of a small coterie of advisers who’ve never had anything to do with local government, at least – thinking they’re a good idea.

But who cares about that when there’s the opportunity to bring clientelism formally into British politics. Gather enough votes for your executive mayor, and you too could be rewarded with a nice cushy sinecure at the Council. Welcome to localism, birthplace of the municipal Berlusconi.