To Tobias Jones et al: The next time you want to write an article about the ‘secular fundamentalist’ conspiracy, could you try to come up with one that doesn’t use an argument on the lines of ‘ooh, that Richard Dawkins is a bit rude’ as a piece of supposed evidence?
To Richard Dawkins et al: If there is a conspiracy, could you invite me along to one of the meetings, as I could do with a bit of fun?
by John Hodgman
by Drew Westen
by Ian Mortimer
by Jeff Greenfield
by Heather Peace
Be fair Nick. Evidence isn’t the religious lobby’s strong point (for obvious reasons), and the Dawkins is a very rude man argument has more factual basis than the rest of that article.
That article annoyed me more than anything I’ve read in the Guardian for ages. I think I’ll write a cross letter. That’ll show ‘em